EPT-2 vs ECMWF HRES: AI Forecast Accuracy in Europe

1 / 5

EPT-2 outperforms ECMWF HRES on 10 m wind, 100 m wind, 2 m temperature, and surface solar radiation across 0–240 h lead times on StationBench.

2 / 5

EPT-2e beats the 50-member ECMWF ENS mean on RMSE and CRPS at virtually every lead time while running at a fraction of the compute cost.

3 / 5

ECMWF AIFS underperforms raw IFS ENS on probabilistic metrics and lacks SSRD output, which limits its value for energy trading.

4 / 5

Jua for Energy runs alongside existing ECMWF subscriptions and replaces manual pipelines and spreadsheets rather than the ECMWF feed itself.

5 / 5

Run a live benchmark of EPT-2 against your current provider.