Weather Forecasting
1 / 5
European weather model latency creates a 4–6 hour gap between ECMWF forecast initialization and data availability, which leaves traders exposed to stale information.
2 / 5
Traditional NWP constraints limit ECMWF to two full daily runs, while Jua EPT-2 delivers up to 24 updates per day at a fraction of the compute cost.
3 / 5
Each 4-percentage-point accuracy gain from fresher forecasts can save a 1 GW wind portfolio €1.5 M or a 1 GW solar portfolio €3 M annually.
4 / 5
Jua EPT-2 consistently outperforms ECMWF HRES on wind, temperature, and solar radiation across all lead times, and completes runs about 2.5 hours ahead of competing models.
5 / 5
Energy traders can benchmark EPT-2 against their current provider in under five minutes.
ECMWF's 4–6 hr latency costs energy traders millions. Jua EPT-2 runs 24x daily, 2.5 hrs ahead of ECMWF. Benchmark it against your forecasts today.